Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Factors associated with satisfaction and perceived helpfulness of mental healthcare: a World Mental Health Surveys report
Authors: Harris, Meredith G
Kazdin, Alan E
Munthali, Richard J
Vigo, Daniel V
Stein, Dan J
Viana, Maria Carmen
Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio
Al-Hamzawi, Ali
Alonso, Jordi
Andrade, Laura Helena
Bunting, Brendan
Chardoul, Stephanie
Gureje, Oye
Hu, Chiyi
Hwang, Irving
Karam, Elie G
Navarro-Mateu, Fernando
Nishi, Daisuke
Orozco, Ricardo
Sampson, Nancy A
Scott, Kate M
Vladescu, Cristian
Wojtyniak, Bogdan
Xavier, Miguel
Zarkov, Zahari
Kessler, Ronald C
Affiliations: Faculty of Medicine 
Keywords: Healthcare providers
Mental disorders
Mental health services
Patient perspectives
Perceived helpfulness
Substance use disorders
Issue Date: 2024-03-01
Publisher: BMC
Part of: International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Volume: 18
Issue: 1
Mental health service providers are increasingly interested in patient perspectives. We examined rates and predictors of patient-reported satisfaction and perceived helpfulness in a cross-national general population survey of adults with 12-month DSM-IV disorders who saw a provider for help with their mental health.

Data were obtained from epidemiological surveys in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Respondents were asked about satisfaction with treatments received from up to 11 different types of providers (very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) and helpfulness of the provider (a lot, some, a little, not at all). We modelled predictors of satisfaction and helpfulness using a dataset of patient-provider observations (nā€‰=ā€‰5,248).

Most treatment was provided by general medical providers (37.4%), psychiatrists (18.4%) and psychologists (12.7%). Most patients were satisfied or very satisfied (65.9-87.5%, across provider) and helped a lot or some (64.4-90.3%). Spiritual advisors and healers were most often rated satisfactory and helpful. Social workers in human services settings were rated lowest on both dimensions. Patients also reported comparatively low satisfaction with general medical doctors and psychiatrists/psychologists and found general medical doctors less helpful than other providers. Men and students reported lower levels of satisfaction than women and nonstudents. Respondents with high education reported higher satisfaction and helpfulness than those with lower education. Type of mental disorder was unrelated to satisfaction but in some cases (depression, bipolar spectrum disorder, social phobia) was associated with low perceived helpfulness. Insurance was unrelated to either satisfaction or perceived helpfulness but in some cases was associated with elevated perceived helpfulness for a given level of satisfaction.

Satisfaction with and perceived helpfulness of treatment varied as a function of type of provider, service setting, mental status, and socio-demographic variables. Invariably, caution is needed in combining data from multiple countries where there are cultural and service delivery variations. Even so, our findings underscore the utility of patient perspectives in treatment evaluation and may also be relevant in efforts to match patients to treatments.
ISSN: 1752-4458
DOI: 10.1186/s13033-024-00629-7
Open URL: Link to full text
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine

Show full item record

Record view(s)

checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Dimensions Altmetric

Dimensions Altmetric

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.