Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/6085
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaher, Janaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKleib, Joelleen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenzerzour, Mahfouden_US
dc.contributor.authorAbriak, Nor Edineen_US
dc.contributor.authorAouad, Georgesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T06:27:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-11T06:27:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/6085-
dc.description.abstractDue to the large volumes of sediments dredged each year and their classification as waste materials, proper management is needed to efficiently dispose of or recycle them. This study aimed to recycle flash-calcined dredged sediment in the development of an eco-friendly 3D-printable mortar. Mortars with 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30% of flash-calcined sediment were studied. Two tests were carried out to determine the printability of the mixtures. First, a manual gun device was used to examine the extrudability, then a modified minislump test was conducted to assess the buildability and shape-retention ability of the mixtures. Furthermore, the flow table test and the fall cone test were used to evaluate the workability and structural buildup, respectively. The compressive strength was also evaluated at 1, 7, and 28 days for printed and nonprinted mortar specimens. In addition, isothermal calorimetry measurements were conducted on corresponding cement pastes. The results showed that it was possible to print mortars with up to 10% of flash-calcined sediment with the preservation of extrudability and buildability. The results showed that flash-calcined sediment shortened the setting time, decreased the flowability, and enhanced the shape-retention ability. Nonprinted samples with 5% and 10% of flash-calcined sediment showed a similar to higher compressive strength compared to that of the reference mortar. However, printed samples recorded an equal to lower compressive strength than that of nonprinted samples. In addition, no significant change in the hydration process was detected for blended cement pastes compared to the reference cement paste.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectCementitious materialen_US
dc.subjectFlash-calcined sedimenten_US
dc.subjectMortaren_US
dc.subjectRecyclingen_US
dc.subjectThree-dimensional printingen_US
dc.titleRecycling of Flash-Calcined Dredged Sediment for Concrete 3D Printingen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings12091400-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138795221-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85138795221-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Engineeringen_US
dc.description.volume12en_US
dc.description.issue9en_US
dc.date.catalogued2022-10-11-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/9/1400/htmen_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextBuildingsen_US
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Record view(s)

57
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.