Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5674
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Faludi, Jeremy | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Omar | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Srour, Ola | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mecanna, Selim | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kamareddine, Rami | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chatty, Tejaswini | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-30T12:29:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-30T12:29:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 22204334 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5674 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Do different sustainable design methods generate different sustainable design ideas? Do they also drive different product innovation ideas? This project empirically tested three design methods: The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping, and Biomimicry. Testing involved qualitatively categorizing 1,115 design ideas from 23 workshops for over 30 companies, including consultancies and manufacturers in consumer electronics, furniture, and apparel. The categorized ideas were then counted to determine if the different design methods caused different kinds of ideas. They did. For example, The Natural Step drove more ideas on green material choice, circular end of life, and social impacts, while Biomimicry drove more durability ideas and Whole System Mapping drove more cost reduction ideas, among other differences. Overall, The Natural Step generated the highest percentage of sustainability ideas, Biomimicry generated the most innovation ideas, and Whole System Mapping generated a balance of both. These preliminary results should help designers and engineers choose design methods suited to the types of design solutions they desire. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.subject | Circular economy | en_US |
dc.subject | Sustainability | en_US |
dc.subject | Innovation | en_US |
dc.subject | Circular economy | en_US |
dc.title | Preliminary results testing what different design solutions arise from different sustainable design methods | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dc.relation.conference | International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2019 ( 22nd : 5-8 August, 2019 : Netherlands ) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/dsi.2019.342 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85079741570 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85079741570 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Faculty of Engineering | en_US |
dc.description.startpage | 3351 | en_US |
dc.description.endpage | 3360 | en_US |
dc.date.catalogued | 2022-05-30 | - |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.ezproxyURL | http://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-international-conference-on-engineering-design/article/preliminary-results-testing-what-different-design-solutions-arise-from-different-sustainable-design-methods/250BDAB45C4DC82EEFAEBB8B7E1E95AD | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartoftext | Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 2019 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Chemical Engineering |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Record view(s)
56
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.