Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Prescription patterns for tigecycline in severely Ill patients for non-FDA approved indications in a developing country: A compromised outcome||Authors:||Moghnieh, Rima A.
Abdallah, Dania I.
Fawaz, Ismail A.
Kassem, Mohamad Al
Rajab, Nabila El-
Jisr, Tamima El
Tabah, Samaa Al
|Affiliations:||Faculty of Medicine||Keywords:||Acinetobacter baumannii
|Issue Date:||2017||Part of:||Frontiers in microbiology||Volume:||8||Issue:||497||Abstract:||
Introduction: With the rise in antibiotic resistance, tigecycline has been used frequently in off-label indications, based on its in-vitro activity against multidrug-resistant organisms. In this study, our aim was to assess its use in approved and unapproved indications. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective chart review evaluating a 2-year experience of tigecycline use for > 72 h in 153 adult patients inside and outside critical care unit from January 2012 to December 2013 in a Lebanese tertiary-care hospital. Results: Tigecycline was mostly used in off-label indications (81%) and prescribed inside the critical care area, where the number of tigecycline cycles was 16/1,000 patient days. Clinical success was achieved in 43.4% of the patients. In the critically ill group, it was significantly higher in patients with a SOFA score <7 using multivariate analysis (Odds Ratio (OR) = 12.51 [4.29–36.51], P < 0.0001). Microbiological success was achieved in 43.3% of patients. Yet, the univariate and adjusted multivariate models failed to show a significant difference in this outcome between patients inside vs. outside critical care area, those with SOFA score <7 vs. ≥ 7, and in FDA-approved vs. off-label indications. Total mortality reached ~45%. It was significantly higher in critically ill patients with SOFA score ≥7 (OR = 5.17 [2.43–11.01], P < 0.0001) and in off-label indications (OR = 4.00 [1.30–12.31], P = 0.01) using an adjusted multivariate model. Gram-negative bacteria represented the majority of the clinical isolates (81%) and Acinetobacter baumannii predominated (28%). Carbapenem resistance was present in 85% of the recovered Acinetobacter, yet, more than two third of the carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species were still susceptible to tigecycline. Conclusion: In our series, tigecycline has been mostly used in off-label indications, specifically in severely ill patients. The outcome of such infections was not inferior to that of FDA-approved .
|URI:||https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/2430||DOI:||10.3389/fmicb.2017.00497||Open URL:||Link to full text||Type:||Journal Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Medicine|
Show full item record
checked on Aug 6, 2022
checked on Aug 7, 2022
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.