Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/2018
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBachour, Falahen_US
dc.contributor.authorRizkallah, Marounen_US
dc.contributor.authorSebaaly, Ameren_US
dc.contributor.authorBarakat, Angeliqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorRazzouk, Hibaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHage, Rawad Elen_US
dc.contributor.authorNasr, Riaden_US
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, Mirvat Elen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaalouf, Ghassanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-23T09:04:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-23T09:04:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/2018-
dc.description.abstractSummary: This study aims to assess for the first time in the Middle East, the clinical benefits of an FLS model established in a hospital in Beirut, Lebanon. It shows a significant 54% relative risk reduction in re-fracture incidence, confirming the patient-oriented benefit of diffusing this system in the Middle East region. Purpose/introduction: Few hospitals in Lebanon applied Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) program. A type A FLS is established at Bellevue hospital in Beirut in July 2013. This study aims to assess its clinical benefits and efficacy. Methods: Patients aged 50 years and above presenting to our hospital with minimal trauma fracture from July 2012 till June 2014 are enrolled. These are divided into two groups, before (group A) and after (group B) FLS implementation. Both groups are compared for re-fracture incidence, bone health assessment; osteoporosis treatment maintenance, and death in a 2-year follow-up. Results: Nighty-eight patient composing group B are compared to 100 patients in the group A. Around 65% of patients in the FLS group underwent Dexa osteodensitometry following their fracture compared to 28% in the comparator group (p < 0.001). About 54% of patients in group B maintained osteoporosis treatment compared to 26% in group A (p < 0.001). Sixteen percent of patients died in the FLS study group compared to 16% of patients in the comparator group (p = 0.950). A second fracture, happened in 8.2% of patients in the FLS study group compared to 18% of the patients in the comparator group p = 0.004. Number needed to treat reached 10.2 patients. Conclusions: The statistical analysis results go with the overwhelming evidence concerning FLS importance in promoting bone health assessment and osteoporosis treatment in fracture patients. It also confirms the clinical value and the patient-oriented benefit of an implementation of such a system.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectFracture liaison serviceen_US
dc.subjectFragility fractureen_US
dc.subjectElderlyen_US
dc.subject.lcshOsteoporosisen_US
dc.titleFracture liaison service: report on the first successful experience from the middle easten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Physical Educationen_US
dc.description.volume12en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage6en_US
dc.date.catalogued2017-11-06-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.ezproxyURLhttp://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11657-017-0372-xen_US
dc.identifier.OlibID174749-
dc.relation.ispartoftextArchives of osteoporosisen_US
dc.provenance.recordsourceOliben_US
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Arts and Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Department of Physical Education
Show simple item record

Record view(s)

50
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.