Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNini, Roberten_US
dc.descriptionThis paper was presented in " ICTPA, 24th Annual Conference & NACGEA International Symposium on Geo-Trans, Los Angeles, CA, USA,, May 27-29, 2011. ".en_US
dc.description.abstractThere are two widely used methods to determine the liquid limit of a soil; the Atterberg cup according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the fall cone penetrometer according to the British Standards (BS). It appeared that the fall cone test is more reliable than the Atterberg test and therefore it is important to make this comparison. First of all, the author collected twenty-nine samples from the Lebanese territory in order to identify them through many laboratory experiments such as the sieve analysis, the plastic limit, the specific gravity, the soil classification, and the hydrometer. Then, the liquid limit for these soils was measured through the above two mentioned methods. The obtained results indicated that the liquid limit values measured by the American and British standards are governed by a specific rule depending on the silt and the clay fractions of the soil. This rule could be used to verify the compatibility of the liquid limits results by following two different standards for control purpose.en_US
dc.format.extent3 p.en_US
dc.subjectAtterberg cupen_US
dc.subjectFall cone penetrometeren_US
dc.subjectLiquid limiten_US
dc.subjectSilt fractionen_US
dc.subjectClay fractionen_US
dc.titleEffect of the silt and clay fractions on the liquid limit measurements by Atterberg cup and fall cone penetrometeren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextInternational journal of geotechnical engineeringen_US
dc.provenance.recordsourceOliben_US of Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Show simple item record


checked on Nov 27, 2021

Record view(s)

checked on Nov 26, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Dimensions Altmetric

Dimensions Altmetric

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.