Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/1809
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBachawati, Makram Elen_US
dc.contributor.authorManneh, Rimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBelarbi, Rafiken_US
dc.contributor.authorDandres, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorNassab, Carlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZakhem, Henri Elen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-23T09:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-23T09:00:20Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/1809-
dc.description.abstractLebanon, a Mediterranean country, lacks a clear sustainability plan as well as an infrastructure update and management, leading to road flooding, especially in urban areas. Therefore, the installation of Vegetative Roofs (VRs) could be an interesting option for Lebanon. To evaluate if VRs are truly superior to Traditional Gravel Ballasted Roofs (TGBRs) and White Reflective Roofs (WRRs), a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. Potential environmental impacts of an existing Extensive Green Roof (EGR) were compared to three fictitious roofs of the same area: TGBR, WRR, and Intensive Green Roof (IGR). The functional unit used for comparison was: "providing a cover for a surface area of 834 sqm and for 45 years". Specifications of TGBRs and WRRs were provided by local technicians and civil engineers. Furthermore, specifications of VRs were provided by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Country Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Demonstration for the recovery of Lebanon (CEDRO) project. The SimaPro software and Ecoinvent library were used to model the systems considered. Results clearly indicated that EGR was the best option for all environmental impact categories. Rebar, concrete, and thermal insulation were the main contributors to the environmental impacts for TGBR, while rebar, concrete, thermal insulation, and waterproof membrane were the highest contributors for WRR. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis were also performed to verify the robustness of the results.en_US
dc.format.extent9 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectLife Cycle Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectVegetative roofsen_US
dc.subjectReflective roofsen_US
dc.subjectTraditional roofsen_US
dc.subject.lcshLebanonen_US
dc.titleCradle-to-gate Life cycle assessment of traditional gravel ballasted, white reflective, and vegetative roofs: a Lebanese case studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.170-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.volume137en_US
dc.description.startpage833en_US
dc.description.endpage842en_US
dc.date.catalogued2017-10-18-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.ezproxyURLhttp://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.170en_US
dc.identifier.OlibID174402-
dc.relation.ispartoftextJournal of cleaner productionen_US
dc.provenance.recordsourceOliben_US
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemical Engineering
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Dec 4, 2021

Record view(s)

8
checked on Dec 4, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Dimensions Altmetric

Dimensions Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.