Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Antinomies of transcritique and virtue ethics : An Adornian Critique||Authors:||Tassone, Giuseppe||Affiliations:||Cultural Studies Program||Keywords:||Theodor Adorno
|Issue Date:||2008||Part of:||Journal of philosophy & social criticism||Volume:||34||Issue:||6||Start page:||665||End page:||684||Abstract:||
In the wave of critical theory's recent turn to ethics, Karatani's transcritique and Eagleton's ethics of agape have emerged as two of the most outstanding attempts to reinstate morality at the centre of Marx's analysis of capitalist society. This article argues that, in spite of their merits in repositioning the normative generalizations of the moral discourse within the context of Marx's political economy, both theories share certain fundamental flaws which are inherent in the very meaning of the possibility of moral action in a wrong society. By taking Karatani's transcritique as a sample of what Christoph Menke names `rational morality' and Eagleton's revival of classical morality as a variant of `virtue ethics', it is shown that they are both amenable to Adorno's charge that wrong life cannot be lived rightly. Finally, it is contended that what Adorno's criticism indicates is that, when it most matters in real situations, morality always reveals its political overdetermination.
|URI:||https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/1628||DOI:||10.1177/0191453708090333||Ezproxy URL:||Link to full text||Type:||Journal Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Cultural Studies Program|
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.