Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/7747
Title: | Heidegger and the Thorny Issue of (Re)configuring Facticity | Authors: | Darwiche, Frank | Affiliations: | Cultural Studies Program | Keywords: | Being‐historical Facticity Ground‐attunements Heidegger, Martin Kehre, reservedness |
Issue Date: | 2021-09-01 | Part of: | Forum Philosophicum | Volume: | 26 | Issue: | 2 | Start page: | 187 | End page: | 205 | Abstract: | The purpose of this article is twofold. It first seeks to prove that the notion of facticity in Heidegger’s work saw a major change after Being and Time. While several studies did deal with facticity as it appeared before the magnus opus and show the influence it had on the latter’s development, hardly any have dealt with what happens to facticity after Sein und Zeit. This is mostly because facticity, as it imploded, took on different names which fall under the heading of ground-attunements. Secondly, I will show the ambivalent character of this new facticity, where many essential notions, such as thrownness, truth, attunement and guilt, shifted meanings, sometimes almost imperceptibly or surreptitiously. I will show that this ambivalence comes from the fact that the shift in question allowed for an opening of facticity while at the same time bringing in restrictive limits, and thus a closing-off of certain essential issues. This has left several adumbrated questions, such as responsibility, in abeyance. |
URI: | https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/7747 | ISSN: | 14261898 | DOI: | 10.35765/forphil.2021.2602.02 | Open URL: | Link to full text | Type: | Journal Article |
Appears in Collections: | Cultural Studies Program |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.