Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/7415
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNakad, Mantouraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGardelle, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbboud, Ramien_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-20T08:14:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-20T08:14:12Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-01-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/7415-
dc.description.abstractOver the last two decades, numerous studies have highlighted the significance of integrating sustainability into higher education. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in the literature on engineering education for sustainable development, emphasizing the inclusion of this concept within engineering curricula and recognizing the pivotal role that engineers play in achieving the sustainable development goals. Therefore, sporadic engineering faculties worldwide have begun acknowledging and assessing issues related to sustainability in their curricula. As several methods have been employed to assess its inclusion, the aim of this paper is to review the various methods used to gauge how sustainability is incorporated in their respective engineering curricula. We carried out a systematic review of the literature regarding sustainability as assessed specifically in engineering curricula using the Scopus and ERIC databases. We applied PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology and, as a result, 30 papers were included. The results produced 14 methods with the articles highlighting existing limitations. Therefore, the authors recommend the combination of at least two of the methods to efficiently evaluate sustainability in engineering curricula.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectCurriculumen_US
dc.subjectEESDen_US
dc.subjectEngineering educationen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleA Systematic Review of the Different Methods Assessing Sustainability Integration in Engineering Curriculaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su16114549-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195856448-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85195856448-
dc.contributor.affiliationFOE - Dean's Officeen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationFOE - Dean's Officeen_US
dc.description.volume16en_US
dc.description.issue11en_US
dc.date.catalogued2024-06-20-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4549en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextSustainability (Switzerland)en_US
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering-
Appears in Collections:FOE - Dean’s Office
Show simple item record

Record view(s)

41
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.