Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/6985
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaydar, Alaaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaliba, Maritaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHijazi, Mariamen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlameh, Alien_US
dc.contributor.authorHarake, Alien_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T07:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-12T07:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-01-
dc.identifier.issn22102612-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/6985-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Leiomyosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm that is derived from smooth muscle cells in walls of small blood vessels or branch of the inferior vena cava, the uterus and the gastrointestinal tract. Different treatment options are present for the treatment of LMS. However, due to the rarity of LMS, the optimal treatment option is still to be discussed and determined. Presentation of case: A 51-year-old male patient, previously healthy, presented for perianal pain. Biopsy of the mass found showed spindle cell tumors with mild atypia, dense cellularity, and pelvic MRI with contrast showed a well-circumscribed mass of the anus, developed between the layers of the external sphincter with possible invasion of the internal sphincter consistent with Leiomyosarcoma Grade I. Wide excision was performed. Close follow-up should be done every 3 to 6 months for the first 2 to 3 years, every 6 to 12 months for the following 3 years, and annually afterwards. Discussion: The symptoms of LMS include rectal bleeding with rectal and/or abdominal pain, weight loss, constipation, altered bowel motion and protruding mass. Treatment options include wide local excision, abdominoperineal resection, low anterior resection, bloc resection and pelvic exenteration. Patients who underwent wide local excision show a higher local recurrence rate as compared to patients who underwent radical resection. Distant metastasis is higher in patients who underwent radical resection. Conclusion: The treatment options of anal LMS are controversial. At present, very few cases have been reported, thus no universally accepted standard of surgical treatment has been established.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNational Library of Medicineen_US
dc.subjectAbdominoperineal resectionen_US
dc.subjectAnalen_US
dc.subjectCase reporten_US
dc.subjectExcisionen_US
dc.subjectLeiomyosarcomaen_US
dc.subjectSarcomaen_US
dc.titleAnal leiomyosarcoma: A case report and review of literatureen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108744-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169506459-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85169506459-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume110en_US
dc.date.catalogued2023-09-12-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S2210261223008738?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2210261223008738%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=https:%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fen_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextInternational Journal of Surgery Case Reportsen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Record view(s)

31
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.