Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/6103
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSalloum, Saraen_US
dc.contributor.authorBakri, Serenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T07:05:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-13T07:05:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/6103-
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 62-69)en_US
dc.description.abstractHomeroom teachers at the primary level (Grades 1-6), usually not specialized in one subject, are required to teach all subject matters. It is often that the majority of homeroom teachers do have a degree in general education and not a specific subject, and yet need to teach most subjects, even ones they may not be comfortable teaching. This study aims to: (a) compare the teaching efficacy of homeroom primary teachers to that of specialized teachers, and (b) explore the extent to which the curriculum provided to homeroom teachers provides the necessary content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for effective teaching and promotion of deeper understandings of content. My study was exploratory and the methodology appropriate for my study was a mixed-method approach that involved questionnaire and interview data. Mixed methods research is formally defined as the class of research where the researcher mix or combine quantitative and qualitative research techniques, methods, approaches, concepts, or languages into a single study (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). The qualitative research methods included interviews with ten homeroom and ten specialized elementary teachers and interviews with two principals from the two elementary models (homeroom and specialist). Quantitative research methods included sections of two related and widely used Likert-scale questionnaires the “Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument” (STEBI), and the “Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument” (MTEBI) (Riggs & Knochs, 1990; Enochs et al., 2000). My interview data showed that homeroom teachers expressed higher compared to specialized in terms of motivation and well-being as teachers, they also felt supported by their schools in terms of professional development and being provided with useful teaching resources. Interview and questionnaire data showed that homeroom teachers’ sense of efficacy emerged as the same and at times greater than the specialist teachers. The findings are further discussed along with implications and recommendations for subsequent research and practice.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Seren Bakrien_US
dc.format.extent1 online resource (viii, 74 pages) : ill., tablesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsThis object is protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the personal and educational use exceptions must be obtained from the copyright holderen_US
dc.subjectContent knowledge, curriculum, pedagogical content knowledge, homeroom teachers, specialized teachers, and self-efficacyen_US
dc.subject.lcshTeaching effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.lcshTeaching--Methodsen_US
dc.subject.lcshTeacher effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.lcshUniversity of Balamand--Dissertationsen_US
dc.subject.lcshDissertations, Academicen_US
dc.titleExploratory study focusing on homeroom and specialist elementary teachers' teaching efficacy and their confidence in teaching science and mathematicsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.corporateUniversity of Balamanden_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Educationen_US
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Arts and Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Balamanden_US
dc.date.catalogued2022-10-13-
dc.description.degreeMA in Educationen_US
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.ezproxyURLhttp://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=http://olib.balamand.edu.lb/projects_and_theses/300473.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.OlibID300473-
dc.provenance.recordsourceOliben_US
Appears in Collections:UOB Theses and Projects
Show simple item record

Record view(s)

70
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.