Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Ultrasound-guided Central Line Insertion and Standard Peripherally Inserted Catheter Placement in Preterm Infants: Comparing Results from Prospective Study in a Single-center
Authors: Al Hamod, Dany Antanios
Zeidan, Smart
Al Bizri, Ayah
Baaklini, Georges
Nassif, Yolla
Affiliations: Faculty of Medicine 
Faculty of Medicine 
Keywords: Central line
Internal jugular vein
Peripherally inserted central catheter
Preterm neonates
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: National Library of Medicine
Part of: North American Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume: 8
Issue: 5
Start page: 205
End page: 209
Among preterm infants, the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is the standard line for central venous access; however, its placement exposes them to hypothermia and pain. Ultrasound (US)-guided central line insertion may be less morbid than standard PICC line.

To determine the ease, success rate, and morbidity associated with US-guided central line insertion in the internal jugular vein (IJV) by comparing it to the standard PICC line placement.

Materials and Methods:
This is a single-center nonrandomized prospective study evaluating preterm infants between October 2013 and June 2014. Patients were allocated into two groups: The standard group (control group) who underwent blind PICC line insertion and the intervention group who underwent a percutaneous US-guided central line insertion in the IJV. The epicutaneo-cava-catheter was used in both groups.

Fifty neonates were enrolled on study. A statistically difference in favor of US-IJV insertion was noted concerning the rate of successful first attempt (P < 0.001), insertion (P = 0.001), and procedure duration (P < 0.001) and number of trials (P < 0.001) compared to PICC. No difference in complications (P = 1.000) was noted.

US guided catheterization of the IJV technique is faster than PICC line insertion with higher rates of successful first attempt and insertion, less procedure duration and fewer number of trials compared to PICC line insertion. There were no differences in complications.
ISSN: 2250-1541
DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.183011
Open URL: Link to full text
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine

Show full item record


checked on Apr 1, 2023

Record view(s)

checked on Apr 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Dimensions Altmetric

Dimensions Altmetric

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.