Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5917
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaram, Elie Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorEl Khoury, Elaineen_US
dc.contributor.authorItani, Lynnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-27T09:32:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-27T09:32:17Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1745-0179-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5917-
dc.description.abstractAn essential point in evaluating the utility of measuring temperaments is the stability of the instrument used especially in the presence of mental disorders. One of the most commonly used instruments in the clinical setting is the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A). To our knowledge, the TEMPS-A's stability in an outpatient adult clinical setting has not been evaluated.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNational Library of Medicineen_US
dc.subjectAnxiousen_US
dc.subjectCyclothymicen_US
dc.subjectDysthymicen_US
dc.subjectHyperthymicen_US
dc.subjectIrritableen_US
dc.subjectTemps Aen_US
dc.titleHow Stable are Temperaments in the Clinical Setting: A Pilot Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1745017901612010059-
dc.identifier.pmid27733865-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume12en_US
dc.description.issue59en_US
dc.description.startpage63en_US
dc.date.catalogued2022-07-27-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054501/en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextClinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Healthen_US
dc.description.campusSGH campusen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 30, 2024

Record view(s)

42
checked on Dec 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.