Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5744
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSoudeiha, Michelineen_US
dc.contributor.authorSokhn, E Salemen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaoud, Ziaden_US
dc.contributor.authorSarkis, Dollaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T09:05:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-08T09:05:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-02-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5744-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Increasing carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter spp calls for the appraisal of alternative strategies in Acinetobacter spp infection therapy. This study aims at evaluating colistin-carbapenem combination against Acinetobacter spp using the checkerboard, Etest, and time-kill methods. Methodology: One hundred nonrepetitive Acinetobacter spp isolates were collected from patients admitted at the Saint-George-Hospital-University-Medical-Center over a one year period. The identification was performed using the API20NE and confirmed by the amplification of the blaOXA-51-like. Susceptibility to colistin, and carbapenems were determined using the Etest, microdilution methods and interpreted according to the CLSI, 2015. Detection of the carbapenemases was performed by PCR amplification method. Clonality was determined by the 3-Locus PCR-typing and ERIC-PCR methods. The synergistic potential of the combination was determined by calculating the Fractional-Inhibitory-Concentration-Index, which determines a synergistic, additive, indifferent or antagonistic effect. Results: In our study (84%) of the isolates were carbapenem resistant. Only one strain showed resistance to colistin. (99%) and (77%) of the Acinetobacter spp isolates harbored blaOXA-51-like and blaOXA-23-like respectively. (86.2%) of the A.baumannii isolates pertained to the International Clone II. An additive effect of the colistin-carbapenem combination was determined using the 3 methods. A decrease of 2.6 and 2.8 folds in the MIC of colistin was showed in colistin-meropenem and colistin-imipenem, respectively (p < 0.001). The Colistin-meropenem showed better effects when compared to colistin-imipenem (p < 0.05). Only a few isolates showed a synergistic effect in the time-kill assay. Conclusion: Our study showed that the decrease in the MIC of colistin following colistin-carbapenem combination might be a promising antimicrobial approach for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleIn vitro analysis of colistin-carbapenem combination activity against Acinetobacter spp infectionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3855/jidc.10072-
dc.identifier.pmid31804986-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071778332-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85071778332-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume12en_US
dc.description.issue21en_US
dc.date.catalogued2022-06-08-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/31804986en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextJournal of infection in developing countriesen_US
dc.description.campusSGH campusen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Record view(s)

43
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.