Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5720
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Ignacioen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorVandvik, Per Olaven_US
dc.contributor.authorAgoritsas, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMas, Gemmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrignardello-Petersen, Rominaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmparanza, Joseen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCullagh, Laurenen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Sitio, Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGinn, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlmodaimegh, Hinden_US
dc.contributor.authorAlmodaimegh, Khaliden_US
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Solangeen_US
dc.contributor.authorRojas, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorStirnemann, Jérômeen_US
dc.contributor.authorIrani, Jihaden_US
dc.contributor.authorHlais, Sanien_US
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reemen_US
dc.contributor.authorBdair, Fadien_US
dc.contributor.authorAly, Abdelrahmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKristiansen, Annetteen_US
dc.contributor.authorIzcovich, Arielen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Anggieen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrozek, Janen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchünemann, Holger J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-06T10:05:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-06T10:05:13Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn08954356-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5720-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations to assist clinicians in decision-making and to reduce the gap between best current research evidence and clinical practice. However, some argue that providing preappraised evidence summaries alone, rather than recommendations, is more appropriate. The objective of the study is to evaluate clinicians’ preferences, and understanding of the evidence and intended course of action in response to evidence summaries with and without recommendations. Study Design Setting: We included practicing clinicians attending educational sessions across 10 countries. Clinicians were randomized to receive relevant clinical scenarios supported by research evidence of low or very low certainty and accompanied by either strong or weak recommendations developed with the GRADE system. Within each group, participants were further randomized to receive the recommendation plus the corresponding evidence summary or the evidence summary alone. We evaluated participants’ preferences and understanding for the presentation strategy, as well as their intended course of action. Results: One hundred eighty-nine of 219 (86%) and 201 of 248 (81%) participants preferred having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries for both strong and weak recommendations, respectively. Across all scenarios, less than half of participants correctly interpreted information provided in the evidences summaries (e.g., estimates of effect, certainty in the research evidence). The presence of a recommendation resulted in a more appropriate intended course of action for two scenarios involving strong recommendations. Conclusion: Evidence summaries alone are not enough to impact clinicians’ course of action. Clinicians clearly prefer having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries in the context of low or very low certainty of evidence (Trial registration NCT02006017).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectClinical practice guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectClinicians’ preferencesen_US
dc.subjectEvidence synthesisen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicineen_US
dc.subjectGRADEen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge translationen_US
dc.titleDo clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendationsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.026-
dc.identifier.pmid29530644-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044735526-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85044735526-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume99en_US
dc.description.startpage33en_US
dc.description.endpage40en_US
dc.date.catalogued2022-06-06-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.ezproxyURLhttp://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.026en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen_US
dc.description.campusSGH campusen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Record view(s)

34
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.