Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5560
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPapas, Ralph Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorKutteh, William Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-10T09:18:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-10T09:18:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5560-
dc.description.abstractPurpose of review Couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) are often referred to reproductive specialists to help determine the reason for their repeated losses. This review will help to develop a strategy that is effective in providing a diagnosis, efficient to administer, and cost-effective to the healthcare system. Recent findings International societies have published different recommendations for the evaluation of RPL, they consider it appropriate to initiate an evaluation after two (or three) clinical miscarriages. On the contrary, the clinician who follows these guidelines will only be able to offer a possible explanation to fewer than half of the couples being evaluated. Recently, genetic testing of miscarriage tissue using 24-chromosome microarray (CMA) analysis at the time of the second pregnancy loss coupled with testing based on society guidelines has been shown provide an explanation in more than 90% of cases. Summary New guidelines for the complete evaluation of RPL should consider adding 24-CMA testing on the miscarriage tissue. Providing couples with an explanation for recurrent loss assists them in dealing with the loss and discourages the clinician from instituting unproven therapies. Truly unexplained pregnancy loss can be reduced to less than 10% with this new algorithm. Incorporation of these strategies will result in significant cost savings to the healthcare system.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleA new algorithm for the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss redefining unexplained miscarriage: review of current guidelinesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/GCO.0000000000000647-
dc.identifier.pmid32590384-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090076260-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85090076260-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume32en_US
dc.description.issue5en_US
dc.description.startpage371en_US
dc.description.endpage379en_US
dc.date.catalogued2022-05-10-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://journals.lww.com/co-obgyn/Fulltext/2020/10000/A_new_algorithm_for_the_evaluation_of_recurrent.10.aspxen_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecologyen_US
dc.description.campusSGH campusen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.