Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5342
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJariwala, Arpit Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorKiran, Manishen_US
dc.contributor.authorHyndman, Iainen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Linda Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Weijieen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbboud, Ramien_US
dc.contributor.authorWigderowitz, Carlos Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-21T07:23:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-21T07:23:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn00219290-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5342-
dc.description.abstractShoulder replacement is indicated in the treatment of pain due to osteoarthritis. Few studies have objectively assessed range of motion (RoM) gains at different post-operative time points. This is a prospective 3D motion analysis study to objectively quantify RoM changes at multiple time points following shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty (SRA) for primary gleno-humeral osteoarthritis, comparing it with clinically measured RoM. Clinical assessment, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, Constant-Morley (CS) and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were recorded. Motion analysis was performed for RoM and three activities of daily living tasks (ADL), pre-operatively and post-operatively at 4 and 12 months. Nineteen shoulders in fifteen patients were included. The mean age was 72 years (range 52-84). There were significant improvements in external and internal rotation, ability to place the hand behind the head and reach the fifth lumbar vertebra, at 4 months on clinical examination and kinematic analysis with no further improvements at 12 months. There was significant improvement in abduction at 4 months with further improvement at 12 months, which was significantly more than noted on clinical assessment. In contrast, kinematic analysis showed a reduction in flexion between 4 and 12 months, while clinically there appeared to be an improvement between these time periods. This is the first study to prospectively utilise objective kinematic 3-D motion analysis in addition to clinical measurements and outcome scores, to investigate the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty at multiple time points after surgery, providing an understanding into the trends of change in these parameters.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subject3D motion analysisen_US
dc.subjectKinematicen_US
dc.subjectShoulder resurfacingen_US
dc.titleKinematic 3-D motion analysis of shoulder resurfacing hemiarthroplasty - An objective assessment methoden_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110454-
dc.identifier.pmid33901934-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104614028-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85104614028-
dc.contributor.affiliationFOE - Dean's Officeen_US
dc.description.volume122en_US
dc.date.catalogued2020-01-21-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.ezproxyURLhttp://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110454en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextJournal of Biomechanicsen_US
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering-
Appears in Collections:FOE - Dean’s Office
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Record view(s)

83
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.