Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5276
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNasrallah, Ali A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Mazenen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbou Heidar, Nassib F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyoub, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.authorNajdi, Jad A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTamim, Hanien_US
dc.contributor.authorEl Hajj, Alberten_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T10:57:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-20T10:57:19Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn17562872-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/5276-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex urologic procedure performed for the treatment of bladder cancer and causes significant morbidity. Wound dehiscence (WD) is a major complication associated with RC and is associated with multiple risk factors. The objectives of this study are to identify clinical risk factors for incidence of WD and develop a risk-prediction model to aid in patient risk-stratification and improvement of perioperative care. Materials and Methods: The American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to derive the study cohort. A univariate analysis provided nine variables eligible for multivariate model entry. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted and refined considering clinical relevance of the variables, and then bootstrapped with 1000 samples, resulting in a five-factor model. Model performance and calibration were assessed by a receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test for goodness of fit, respectively. Results: A cohort of 11,703 patients was identified from years 2005 to 2017, with 342 (2.8%) incidences of WD within 30 days of operation. The final five-factor model included male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 2.5, p < 0.001], surgical site infection (OR = 6.3, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 1.8, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 1.9, p < 0.001), and weight class; morbidly obese patients had triple the odds of WD (OR = 2.9, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis provided a C-statistic of 0.76 and calibration R2 was 0.99. Conclusion: The study yields a statistically robust and clinically beneficial five-factor model for estimation of WD incidence risk following RC, with good performance and excellent calibration. These factors may assist in identifying high-risk patients, providing preoperative counseling and thus leading to improvement in perioperative care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectCystectomyen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative complicationsen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectStatistical modelen_US
dc.subjectSurgical wound dehiscenceen_US
dc.subjectUrinary bladder neoplasmsen_US
dc.titleRisk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction modelen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/17562872211060570-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120681819-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85120681819-
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume13en_US
dc.date.catalogued2021-12-20-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.ezproxyURLhttp://ezsecureaccess.balamand.edu.lb/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872211060570en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextTherapeutic Advances in Urologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Record view(s)

69
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.