Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/1959
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorObeid , Micheleen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoughames, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorAboulhosn, Petraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMadi, Rashaden_US
dc.contributor.authorDaoud, Ziaden_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-23T09:03:48Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-23T09:03:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarhub.balamand.edu.lb/handle/uob/1959-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Approximately 80% of diabetes-related lower extremity amputations are preceded by a foot ulcer. Global studies on the epidemiology of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infections and guidelines detailing the most common pathogens and their respective antimicrobial susceptibilities are available. While Gram-positive cocci, mainly Staphylococcus species (spp.), were the most common organisms cultured from DFU in the United States, the Gram-negative Pseudomonas spp. were found to be the most common in some Middle Eastern countries. In Lebanon, however, such studies remain scarce. This study, conducted in Lebanon, investigated the most common organisms in DFU infections and their antimicrobial profiles. Methodology: We collected data from all documented diabetic foot infections between January 2015 and March 2016, 128 participants total, from 5 different hospitals in various regions of Lebanon. Results: Among all isolates, Enterobacteriaceae (42%), Pseudomonas spp. (18.6%) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (15.3%) were the most frequent bacteria. In addition, 72% of Pseudomonas spp. were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and 63.6% of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to either amoxicillin/clavulanate or ciprofloxacin, 91% were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was only found in hospitalized patients or those who received prior antibiotics. Polymicrobial infections were documented in only 38% of patients. Conclusion: In Lebanon, the most appropriate empirical oral outpatient treatment would be a combination of amoxicillin/clavulanate and ciprofloxacin. As for admitted patients who have failed the oral regimen, piperacillin/tazobactam would then be the treatment of choice. © 2018 Obeid et al.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectFooten_US
dc.subject.lcshDiabetesen_US
dc.subject.lcshInfectionen_US
dc.subject.lcshAntibioticsen_US
dc.subject.lcshLebanonen_US
dc.titleEpidemiology and susceptibility profiles of diabetic foot infections in five hospitals in Lebanonen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Medicineen_US
dc.description.volume12en_US
dc.description.issue5en_US
dc.description.startpage347en_US
dc.description.endpage351en_US
dc.date.catalogued2019-09-20-
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OlibID207761-
dc.identifier.openURLhttps://www.jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/10063/1877en_US
dc.relation.ispartoftextJournal of infection in developing countriesen_US
dc.provenance.recordsourceOliben_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Show simple item record

Record view(s)

55
checked on Dec 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.